I was invited by the Ohio APTA to submit an article to their monthly state magazine describing the The DSR Method that I teach. 

My Concern:

So the profession is starting to catch on regarding the inadequacies of the predominant predictive biomechanical model, but treatment remains largely unchanged. The few conversations about what to do now in light of the evidence just generates more complicated biomechanical, linear approaches (ie, educate [read: give facts], pace and grade movements and add some reassurance "it will be alright"). 

How do you address the emerging complexities and do you think we can deal with this evidence using the same paradigmatic thinking of the past century?

I don't believe we can. 

Here's why:   So It's Complex…Now What?